• ntrwriter

    There's a lot of good research and analysis here, Matt. Well done. But your point about this program keeping down costs is a little weak. There is nothing here that keeps an insurance company from raising premiums, especially when dealing with a chronically ill patient. That $7500 deductible every year will do less for people with cancer who need several hundred thousand dollars worth of treatment annually. Plus, you'd still need to ban lifetime caps on benefits. And for people who are relatively healthy, why would theyever want to stop receiving 10,000+ dollars per year? Does this really encourage them to make more money, get educated or get a different job when they know that check is just going to disappear and they can just save it that way. The same, of course, can be said for people on welfare except welfare doesn't roll into a savings plan. My point is, it's still the government giving people money. Why doesn't the gov't just write us all a check every year? But if we stop paying taxes, it just ends any safeguards. Not only with the sick not get care, but they'll be no money to mitigate that.

    Health care is not something that can be easily handled by the free market. There are a lot of issues that just don't work well. Pre-existing conditions, rescission, caps, preventative care. Also, the report you cited was for people on Medicaid WITH disabilities. I think the amount spent is much lower for low income residents who are in decent shape. Now compare receiving $5000 with a $7500 deductible. That's quite a bit more in cost for the the patient.

    Thanks for the read, though. I learn a little bit more everyday.

  • ntrwriter

    There's a lot of good research and analysis here, Matt. Well done. But your point about this program keeping down costs is a little weak. There is nothing here that keeps an insurance company from raising premiums, especially when dealing with a chronically ill patient. That $7500 deductible every year will do less for people with cancer who need several hundred thousand dollars worth of treatment annually. Plus, you'd still need to ban lifetime caps on benefits. And for people who are relatively healthy, why would theyever want to stop receiving 10,000+ dollars per year? Does this really encourage them to make more money, get educated or get a different job when they know that check is just going to disappear and they can just save it that way. The same, of course, can be said for people on welfare except welfare doesn't roll into a savings plan. My point is, it's still the government giving people money. Why doesn't the gov't just write us all a check every year? But if we stop paying taxes, it just ends any safeguards. Not only with the sick not get care, but they'll be no money to mitigate that.

    Health care is not something that can be easily handled by the free market. There are a lot of issues that just don't work well. Pre-existing conditions, rescission, caps, preventative care. Also, the report you cited was for people on Medicaid WITH disabilities. I think the amount spent is much lower for low income residents who are in decent shape. Now compare receiving $5000 with a $7500 deductible. That's quite a bit more in cost for the the patient.

    Thanks for the read, though. I learn a little bit more everyday.

  • http://www.medicaiddoctors.net Medicaid Doctors

    Oh!…that’s great helpful, it’s so right to me! Million thanks for the article,