<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Talk Of Liberty &#187; http</title>
	<atom:link href="http://talkofliberty.com/tag/http/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://talkofliberty.com</link>
	<description>An American Perspective</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 01 Jan 2012 22:18:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Voting For Santorum is Voting For Another War</title>
		<link>http://talkofliberty.com/voting-santorum-voting-war/</link>
		<comments>http://talkofliberty.com/voting-santorum-voting-war/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jan 2012 22:18:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Thoughts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[html]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[http]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pennsylvania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rick Santorum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War/Conflict]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://talkofliberty.com/?p=628</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just do not understand how the mainstream GOP Foreign Policy is acceptable to anybody.  Rick Santorum was speaking on Meet The Press, about Iran and how to deal with it.  No wonder our world is  such a mess. First he discusses his legislation which literally took American Dollars, and paid for the Pro Democracy [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just do not understand how the mainstream GOP Foreign Policy is acceptable to anybody.  Rick Santorum was speaking on Meet The Press, about Iran and how to deal with it.  No wonder our world is  such a mess.</p>
<p>First he discusses his legislation which literally took American Dollars, and paid for the Pro Democracy Iran movement to OVERTHROW the current regime.  Explain to me how this in its self isn&#8217;t an Act of War?</p>
<p>Second, his plan is to prevent war by going to war?  By bombing them strategically and destroying their capabilities of creating a nuclear weapon.  The only problem is that Iran is a member of the nuclear non proliferation treaty, has inspections being done, and isn&#8217;t even close to having a bomb, yet we should go to war, risking thousands to millions of lives and what is left of the wealth of our country to stop them?</p>
<p><embed span="" class="hiddenSpellError" pre="embed " />src=&#8221;http://c.brightcove.com/services/viewer/federated_f8/271557391&#8243; bgcolor=&#8221;#FFFFFF&#8221; flashVars=&#8221;videoId=1359013156001&amp;linkBaseURL=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.thedailybeast.com%2Farticles%2F2012%2F01%2F01%2Frick-santorum-ron-paul-and-more-sunday-talk.html&amp;playerId=271557391&amp;viewerSecureGatewayURL=https://console.brightcove.com/services/amfgateway&amp;servicesURL=http://services.brightcove.com/services&amp;cdnURL=http://admin.brightcove.com&amp;domain=embed&amp;autoStart=false&amp;&#8221; base=&#8221;http://admin.brightcove.com&#8221; name=&#8221;flashObj&#8221; width=&#8221;486&#8243; height=&#8221;412&#8243; seamlesstabbing=&#8221;false&#8221; type=&#8221;application/x-shockwave-flash&#8221; swLiveConnect=&#8221;true&#8221; pluginspage=&#8221;http://www.macromedia.com/shockwave/download/index.cgi?P1_Prod_Version=ShockwaveFlash&#8221;&gt;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Wake up America, get your country back.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://talkofliberty.com/voting-santorum-voting-war/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Some blogs to check out</title>
		<link>http://talkofliberty.com/blogs-check/</link>
		<comments>http://talkofliberty.com/blogs-check/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jun 2010 06:01:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Thoughts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Constitution Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Disaster/Accident]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federalist No. 51]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gif]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Has Ever Said]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[http]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Madam Speaker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Tushnet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natural Disaster]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politician]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ron Paul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States Constitution]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://talkofliberty.com/?p=463</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I always like to mention great blogs I read.  Here are a few that are worth a read.  It is always  good to share your thoughts and views on the latest topics. http://talkofliberty.com Presentations on the Budget and Economic Outlook &#8211; The Prosperity Caucus was described in a recent article in The Hill newspaper as [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I always like to mention great blogs I read.  Here are a few that are worth a read.  It is always  good to share your thoughts and views on the latest topics. http://talkofliberty.com</p>
<ul>
<li><a rel="nofollow" href="http://cboblog.cbo.gov/?p=481">Presentations on the Budget and Economic Outlook</a> &#8211; The Prosperity Caucus was described in a recent article in The Hill newspaper as a group founded in 1986 with the purpose of “gather[ing] libertarian-minded economists, Hill staffers and academics … to hear someone talk about the &#8230;</li>
<li><a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.bloodhoundrealty.com/BloodhoundBlog/?p=1443">BloodhoundBlog.com | Defending Redfin: Sweet Digs weblog buried by &#8230;</a> &#8211; The Northwest Multiple Listing Service has fined Redfin $50000 and asked them to stop publishing a popular blog in which contractors for the online real estate brokerage posted reviews of Seattle area homes. &#8230;</li>
<li><a rel="nofollow" href="http://californiascapitol.com/blog/?p=3080">Guest Editorial: The Cowboy Libertarian on the GOP Primary at &#8230;</a> &#8211; (Editor&#8217;s Note: The Cowboy Libertarian is Patrick Dorinson of PD Communications in Sacramento. Previously, Dorinson has been a spokesman for NASA, communications director for California&#8217;s Business, Transportation and Housing Agency and, &#8230;</li>
<li><a rel="nofollow" href="http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/edwest/100042838/the-future-of-right-wing-politics-libertarian-islamophobes-or-inter-faith-gay-bashers/">The future of Right-wing politics – &#8216;libertarian Islamophobes&#8217; or &#8230;</a> &#8211; I was supposed to be going to the Dutch embassy tonight for an election party, but being unable to find a Geert Wilders wig anywhere I gave it a miss.</li>
<li><a rel="nofollow" href="http://robert.williamsonline.us/index.php/2003/02/why-i-am-not-a-libertarian/">Why I am not a Libertarian « Dead Man Blogging</a> &#8211; I am crucified with Christ: nevertheless I live; yet not I, but Christ liveth in me: and the life which I now live in the flesh I live by the faith of the Son of God, who loved me, and gave himself for me. I frequently find myself in total agreement with libertarians. This has caused quite a bit of self-examination and considering whether I fundamentally agree with libertarianism.</li>
<li><a rel="nofollow" href="http://michellemalkin.com/2007/05/19/trutheriness-and-ron-paul/">Michelle Malkin » Trutheriness and Ron Paul</a> &#8211; First, some corrections: Last week, on John Gibson&#8217;s Fox News Channel show, “The Big Story,” I was asked to comment on 9/11 conspiracy theorists and Ron Paul. Here&#8217;s the video. In the segment, I referred to “Students and Scholars for &#8230;</li>
<li><a rel="nofollow" href="http://blogs.sos.wa.gov/FromOurCorner/index.php/2010/01/parties-still-dont-like-top-2-primary/">Parties still don&#8217;t like Top 2 Primary</a> &#8211; The Democratic, Republican and Libertarian parties, getting ready for a court date in October, have submitted their papers to Judge Coughenour, often using identical language. One quote says the party is “irreparably injured by the &#8230;</li>
<li><a rel="nofollow" href="http://acs.blogs.wm.edu/2007/02/20/mark-tushnet-the-political-constitution-of-emergency-powers/">Mark Tushnet: “The Political Constitution of Emergency Powers &#8230;</a> &#8211; American Constitution Society<br />
@ William height: 175px&#8221; height=&#8221;175&#8243; alt=&#8221;Framers&#8221; src=&#8221;http://www. gif&#8221; width=&#8221;297&#8243; align=&#8221;right&#8221; /&gt;powers situation?  Tushnet pointed to the Madisonian vision, expressed in Federalist No. 51, which explains that [a]mbition must be made to check ambition in times of emergency.</li>
<li><a rel="nofollow" href="http://tusb.stanford.edu/2007/07/whats_the_matter_with_colleges.html">The Unofficial Stanford Blog » Blog Archive » What&#8217;s the Matter &#8230;</a> &#8211; What&#8217;s the Matter with Colleges? Answer: It&#8217;s You, not Us. He wants to know why colleges no longer lead our society in culture like they did in the 60&#8242;s and 70&#8242;s and even 80&#8242;s. The main reason is that there are a lot more people IN college today.</li>
<li><a rel="nofollow" href="http://weblogs.swarthmore.edu/burke/2007/05/21/lloyd-alexander-and-moral-instruction/">Lloyd Alexander and Moral Instruction « Easily Distracted</a> &#8211; Lloyd Alexander died late last week at the age of 83. His work, particularly his Prydain Chronicles, has been routinely recommended for kids who have enjoyed the Harry Potter series. The Prydain books were among my absolute favorites &#8230;</li>
<li><a rel="nofollow" href="http://dactyl.whitman.edu/wordpress/archives/2006/11/08/election-results/">soapbox » Blog Archive » Election Results</a> &#8211; The non-official physics and astronomy blog at Dartmouth. Well, it looks like everything is turning out ok. I don&#8217;t think a lot of you folks were really politically aware in 1994 when the Republicans swept into office with the Contract with America Newt Gingrich, an impressive-sounding list of things that congress was largely already doing, followed by dramatic cuts to social services and science spending.</li>
<li><a rel="nofollow" href="http://punkassblog.com/2007/07/05/libertarian-troll-bingo/">comment on libertarian troll bingo by hypocee</a> &#8211; yah, i love heinlein but despise libertarianarchists (starship troopers, for example, should be like garlic-flavored holy water to any good teabagger). the rest seems to fit pretty well.</li>
<li><a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.finlandforthought.net/2007/09/30/finland-the-most-libertarian-second-most-leftist-in-eu/">Finland for Thought » Finland the most libertarian &amp; second most &#8230;</a> &#8211; According to PoliticalCompass.org (which offers a great test if you haven&#8217;t tried it already), Finland is the most libertarian country in the EU and the second most leftist country in the EU. I took the test three times (results shown &#8230;</li>
<li><a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.urbanagora.com/2007/06/libertarian-web-comics.html">Libertarian Web-comics</a> &#8211; I expect that quite a number of our regular readers enjoy webcomics. I want to introduce you to a pair of them sponsored by Big Head Press. The first one, Roswell, Texas, is written by L. Neil Smith, an award-winning science-fiction &#8230;</li>
<li><a rel="nofollow" href="http://saunderslog.com/2007/07/30/small-l-libertarian/">small l libertarian</a> &#8211; we had a spirited discussion around the breakfast table yesterday morning. topic: politics. always good for some heated debate. and if you followed my facebook profile yesterday, you saw the evidence of the progression of that &#8230;</li>
<li><a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.10zenmonkeys.com/2006/10/30/libertarian-chick-fights-boobs-with-boobs/">libertarian chick fights boobs with boobs</a> &#8211; while most of the dialogue during this campaign has been sex-negative, there have been a few cases in which women candidates have tried to use their ample bosoms to attract positive attention. by ru sirius,</li>
<li><a rel="nofollow" href="http://kerryhowley.com/2007/12/22/is-singapore-a-libertarian-utopia/">Is Singapore a Libertarian Utopia?</a> &#8211; Matthew Yglesias kindly comments on “Guests in the Machine”: I&#8217;d definitely recommend that you give Kerry Howley&#8217;s Reason article on guest workers in Singapore a read. It&#8217;s a very thorough and balanced discussion of the way it works. &#8230;</li>
<li><a rel="nofollow" href="http://libertymaven.com/2007/12/19/the-official-media-guide-to-attacking-ron-paul/615/">The Official Media Guide to Attacking Ron Paul :: Liberty Maven</a> &#8211; Liberty Maven has uncovered a letter from the office of the “Main Stream Media Czar”. Unfortunately, the letter was not signed by name, on.</li>
<li><a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.phoenixrealestateguy.com/the-stupidest-thing-ive-ever-heard-a-politician-say/?utm_source=Arkayne.com&amp;utm_medium=Plugin&amp;utm_campaign=phxreguy">The Stupidest Thing I&#8217;ve Ever Heard a Politician Say The Phoenix . </a> &#8211; Let&#8217;s face it, sometimes politicians say the dumbest things. And on March 25, 2010, Ron Paul (R-TX) may have taken first prize in the Stupidest Thing a Politician Has Ever Said contest. Madam Speaker, today I introduce legislation to permanently extend the first-time homebuyer tax credit and to make the credit available to people whose homes have been destroyed by a natural disaster, such as a hurricane.</li>
<li><a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.phoenixrealestateguy.com/home-buyer-tax-credit-extension-yet-another-bill-introduced/">Home Buyer Tax Credit Extension: Yet another bill introduced — The &#8230;</a> &#8211; UPDATE Nov 5, 2009: The Senate and House have both passed legislation extending and expanding the home buyers tax credit. See details here! uscapital Back in June, I wrote an article, Homebuyer Tax Credit to be Extended? Expanded? &#8230;</li>
<li><a rel="nofollow" href="http://ocaoimh.ie/the-25-most-difficult-questions/">The 25 most difficult questions</a> &#8211; The 25 most difficult questions you&#8217;ll be asked in a job interview.</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://talkofliberty.com/blogs-check/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Health Care Has Passed, Now What?</title>
		<link>http://talkofliberty.com/health-care-passed-what/</link>
		<comments>http://talkofliberty.com/health-care-passed-what/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 06:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Thoughts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health insurance in the United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare in the Netherlands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare reform in the United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[http]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[incredible intelligent law makers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insurance companies way]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insurance company cover individuals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insurance coverage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insurance industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insurance market place]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insurance plan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insurance policies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insurance policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insurance pool]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insurance problems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law saying]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[moms insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mothers insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[payer insurance pool]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pre-existing condition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smart insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Types of insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://talkofliberty.com/?p=344</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So health care reform has basically passed through the final turn and is making its way across the finish line.  I have seen many sides to the debate and there are a few things I have observed.  I watch those on the left asking why anyone could possible be opposed to this legislation?  Here are [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So health care reform has basically passed through the final turn and is making its way across the finish line.  I have seen many sides to the debate and there are a few things I have observed.  I watch those on the left asking why anyone could possible be opposed to this legislation?  Here are the top 3 reasons this reform is so loved on the left.  On the surface they all seem like good ideas, with the swipe of the magic legislative wand, all these issues will be fixed.  Not really, here is why.</p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" title="Health Insurance Does Not Insure Health" href="http://flickr.com/photos/75766019@N00/3907004058"><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3195/3907004058_d9cdd3d75e.jpg" alt="" /></a></p>
<ol>
<li>No preexisting conditions.</li>
<li>Coverage until age 26 on      parents plan</li>
<li>Prevents major price      increases.</li>
</ol>
<p>The three different issues that are being addressed are all intertwined.  To keep this short and simple explaining number three, preventing major price increases is really just another way of saying price controls.  The bottom lines with price controls are they create shortages.  If insurance companies do not have any pricing power to bring in more money, they will not be able to pay more for needed services.  This means rationing of care.  It will happen; anyone can reason that if there isn’t enough money to pay for the expenses, limits on spending must happen.  Who decides where money is better spent, that will now be someone in Washington.  Good bad or ugly, without being able to raise premiums means there is not an unlimited supply of money for services.  Prices will continue to shoot through the roof because of the crown jewel of this reform bill, preexisting conditions.</p>
<p>Our incredible intelligent law makers figured out they simply needed to write a law saying no more preexisting conditions, and that will solve all of our insurance problems as a nation. It all sounds great, why didn&#8217;t they do this a long time ago, because it just isn&#8217;t that simple.  The reason it isn&#8217;t simple is because the mish mash of insurance companies and how we get coverage.  Our current system is a patchwork of coverage inter tangled through ridiculous regulations.</p>
<p>Consider the first crazy way we get insurance…….. from our employer.  It is ridiculous since if you lose or quit your job, you lose your insurance.  Why would anyone purchase based on an employer?  We do because of taxes and other regulations requiring companies to provide it. Next it is even more complicated with the ridiculous idea that we can&#8217;t shop across state lines.  This means if your employer is in NY, then your insurance plan has to be purchased by your company in NY.  If you live in a different office of the company located in a different state, you still have NY insurance.  If you lose your job, by law you must give up your coverage since you are out of state and shopping across state lines is illegal.</p>
<p>The problem with a preexisting condition is when someone with it, has not been paying into an insurance pool.  There are many reasons why this happens.  Because most insurance policies are attached to the job, as soon as someone gets very sick, they will likely have to resign losing their current insurance policy, now with the new law, they will simply buy in to a new plan.   The problem is that the old insurance company got all the profit while the new company will get all the expenses.</p>
<p>A likely outcome of this new law is the disappearance of individual policies.  Why would an insurance company cover individuals now since the only people who will be seeking insurance not from an employer will be a sick person?  With no fear of losing insurance from your employer, people will become sick and quit their job to take time off to focus on their health and becoming healthier, this sounds good, but will lead them to an individual policy.  Again it will be a new policy that must cover them regardless of history or cost.</p>
<p>Eventually this will break down the system.  Any smart insurance company will exit this dangerous pool of customers.  That will start forcing over people to the state rolls.  This will lead to a complete breakdown of the insurance industry, and eventually everyone will find themselves on a single payer insurance pool.  That is the final outcome with regulations that are too onerous.  It will distort the insurance market place until it breaks.</p>
<p>The final proof this new plan addresses none of the problems and leads to more of the above, being 26 and still needing to be on your mothers insurance.  This is the case again because we have employer driven insurance coverage.  If individuals bought their own insurance policy from the start, they would never need to be on moms insurance.</p>
<p>The reason this even needed to be included is because of how foolish our system is.  A person has their family’s policy.   The new health care reform will now force coverage on moms insurance until the age of 26 instead of just 18.  That sounds great, but just pushes back the same problem; they will have to change insurance companies.  It doesn’t address the real issue, the fact we change insurance companies way too much for easily fixed reasons.</p>
<p>This is my case for why health care reform will fail.  It fails to address the fundamental issues plaguing our health care system.  It will continue to raise the costs and will eventually run out of money.</p>
<p>Matt</p>
<p>http:.//talkofliberty.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://talkofliberty.com/health-care-passed-what/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

